Gravity Filter Bed Level Monitoring: 80 GHz Radar Level Transmitter Case Study for Waterworks

2026/10/27

berita perusahaan terbaru tentang Gravity Filter Bed Level Monitoring: 80 GHz Radar Level Transmitter Case Study for Waterworks
Site Conditions: Gravity Filter Bed in a Waterworks

The application is a gravity rapid sand filter in a municipal waterworks, one of six identical cells. Above the sand media there is only 1.2–1.5 m of water at normal filtration level, and the level rises by 0.6–0.9 m during backwash. The filter gallery is permanently wet, relative humidity stays near 100 %, and chlorine vapour is present. The existing instruments are cleaned with a hose, and the walkway above the cells vibrates slightly when the backwash blower runs.

Field parameter Typical value Engineering consequence
Water depth above media 1.2–1.5 m (filtration), 2.1 m (backwash) Short span demands a sensor with a small dead zone and millimeter resolution
Humidity ≈100 %, chlorine vapour Enclosure must be IP67/IP68 with corrosion-resistant housing
Surface condition Scum, foam, floating algae in summer Optical and float devices foul quickly; non-contact measurement is preferred
Access Narrow walkway, handrail only Installation must be done from above without entering the cell
Signal destination PLC in the filter gallery, then SCADA Modbus RTU or 4–20 mA is required; wireless only as a backup path
Pain Points Behind the Search
  • Level switches alone gave only "high" and "low" states, so the operators could not see the actual filtration head loss trend.
  • A float device jammed against the wall after a backwash and reported a constant level for three days.
  • Foam formed during backwash caused a false high alarm, and the sequence stopped mid-cycle.
  • Cable trays in the gallery were already full, so pulling new analog cables for six cells was expensive.
Selection Logic

The requirement is a non-contact, short-range, humidity-proof measurement that can be mounted from the walkway and can feed the existing PLC without new cable trays. An 80 GHz radar level transmitter with a small dead zone was selected, supplemented by a wireless remote module for cells where cabling was impossible.

Selection item Specified value Reason
Measuring principle 80 GHz FMCW radar, non-contact Narrow beam ignores the wall and the handrail; no fouling contact with scum
Range and dead zone 0–5 m range, 0.05 m dead zone Covers backwash peak with margin above a 1.5 m working depth
Accuracy ±3 mm Resolves head-loss changes of a few millimetres across a filter run
Antenna PTFE-encased lens Resists chlorine and condensation; easy to wipe
Output 4–20 mA with HART, Modbus RTU option Direct replacement of the old analog input on the PLC
Protection IP67, −40 to +80 °C Wet gallery, warm summer air
Wireless option Battery LoRa node where cabling is blocked Only for signal back-up, not for control
Installation Logic
  1. A stainless bracket is clamped to the handrail so the antenna is centered over the cell and at least 300 mm from the wall — off-center mounting is the main cause of false echoes in a narrow cell.
  2. The antenna face is set at least 500 mm above the maximum backwash level to keep it out of splash.
  3. The beam is aimed vertically; a 1–2° tilt is enough to lose a weak echo off a rippled surface.
  4. The false-echo suppression routine is run empty and full during commissioning, and the resulting map is stored in the device.
  5. Foam during backwash is handled by enabling the foam filter and adding a 10-second signal hold in the PLC, so alarms do not chatter.
  6. The wireless node is mounted outside the wet gallery on the dry wall, with the antenna clear of the metal handrail.
Results
  • Continuous head-loss trending replaced switch-only indication, so backwash starts on measured head loss rather than a fixed timer.
  • Foam-triggered false alarms stopped after the filter routine and signal hold were configured.
  • Because the radar needs no contact with the water, cleaning dropped to a simple monthly wipe of the lens.
  • Only two of six cells needed the wireless module; the rest reused existing analog inputs, keeping the retrofit cost low.
What Buyers Usually Ask Before Ordering

Is radar suitable for a 1.5 m depth? Yes — the dead zone matters more than the range. Confirm the antenna can be mounted 500 mm above the highest water level.

Will foam break the measurement? Foam attenuates the echo; a foam filter plus a short signal hold in the PLC is the practical answer. Extremely thick foam needs a guided-wave probe instead.

Procurement Decision Checklist
  • Provide the exact distance from the mounting bracket to the lowest water level, not just the tank height.
  • Confirm the PLC input type (4–20 mA, HART or Modbus RTU) before ordering the output version.
  • Ask for the echo-map commissioning procedure in the manual; without it, startup depends on the supplier's technician.
  • Specify IP67 minimum for the wet gallery, and a PTFE lens where chlorine is dosed.
Kembali Ke Daftar